Tomorrow's Business Today
Time for slow PR
Perhaps it would be trite to say that capitalism is in crisis.
But it seems fair to suggest it is in need of some good PR.
Certainly the disconnect between what the public wants from it and what it is actually delivering feels wider than I can ever remember.
What most voters want – a few gung-ho entrepreneurs/villains aside – is for things to get slowly better.
For them to see that if they work hard and play mostly by the rules, they’ll get ahead.
They will have better lives than their parents – their children’s lives will be better than their own.
Critics of capitalism tend to be academics, which means they get dismissed as pointy heads moralising from ivory towers without understanding just how hard it is to build or grow a business.
In his latest book, Capitalism and Crises, Colin Mayer accepts the charge while trying to offer practical solutions to both business people and governments about how they might do things better.
Mayer thinks one of the UK’s problems is that no one has a particularly big stake in anything.
Large investors own two or three percent of big companies – they don’t have enough skin in the game to really care, either financially or morally, unlike, say, Denmark or Sweden.
A review in the FT describes his position like this: “The UK is a sad counterpoint, paralysed by a financial system of absent owners, deprived of the regional banking system that shores up German capitalism and bereft of the business angels and venture capitalists who energise US start-ups.”
That isn’t a new criticism, but it seems ever more relevant.
Hack and flak land may be part of the problem. Both sides are trying to get through from one quarter to the next.
Hacks treat temporary setbacks as evidence of failure rather than business as normal. Flaks go into crisis mode.
Maybe we could all take a longer perspective. There seems little chance of that in an election year.
Press release of the day
The government wants to know why UK bank shares are so much more lowly rated than US rivals.
A possible answer here from intellectual property firms Mathys & Squire.
The short version is, they lack innovation.
The firm says: “The UK’s biggest banks have filed just a fraction of the patent applications of their American counterparts over the last 10 years, with the top five UK banks collectively applying for just 290 patents while the top 3 US banks collectively applied for 5,027.”
So, the banks aren’t trying new things, and even when they do, they don’t bother to protect them.